Home | WEB Guide | News | Community | Forums | Search
Skip navigation



News Summary

24 Aug
Exeter man denied refund after paying 30,000 in child support for girl that wasn't his...

08 Aug
Confidence betrayed by the justice system

30 Apr
inquiry into how the child support system works, including links between it and the Fa...

24 Apr
Domestic violence study flawed say mens health advocates

27 Jan
Court refuses to send quake-affected boys to NZ

14 Dec
Child's school project becomes a plea to the Family Court

18 Oct
Woman who took child abroad on trial

18 Oct
Barriers make child's play hard work for grandads

12 Oct
International report on fathers paternity leave after birth of bubs

05 Oct
Child trapped in Egypt by bizarre custody battle

03 Sep
Paternal influence crucial to the success of children

25 Aug
March against Alienation - Fathers Day Hyde Park

13 Aug
Hard line over child abuse (NZ)

06 Jul
False abuse claims are the new court weapon, retiring judge says

11 May
NSW Government releases Domestic Violence App

29 Apr
Defendants To Front Up In Court Study (NZ)

11 Apr
Cost of raising a child to 18 is now $1 million

08 Apr
Cost of raising a child

06 Feb
Gotcha tapes disliked by court

02 Feb
Review of Australias national Paid Parental Leave scheme

06 Jan
Age eligibility for Family Tax Benefit Part A has changed

01 Jan
Minister Macklin announces changes to Newstart

14 Dec
Lawyers say Family Court reforms pose risk to vulnerable (NZ)

21 Oct
There's got to be something more than this! say men

12 Oct
Mothers who deny fathers access to the couples children after a break-up could be jail...

03 Oct
Father must withdraw criminal charges - Girls ordered back to Italy

02 Oct
New name for Federal Magistrates Court revealed.

15 Sep
Opposition Grows to British Governments Parenting Proposal (UK)

23 Aug
WA court counsellors sticking fathers with false allegations

07 Aug
Sisters lose High Court custody challenge

03 Aug
Feuding couples to pay for dispute resolution (NZ)

23 Jul
Child support formula baffles 90% of parents - AIFS study

12 Jul
Dad's 'good times' with daughter cut by court

29 Jun
Family Court seeks missing children

23 Jun
Tough means test locks low-income earners out of Legal Aid

20 Jun
Dads needed on Father's Day [USA]

19 Jun
Government Assent and Notice of increased fees

13 Jun
Publications released on new Family Law changes June 2012

07 Jun
FM Tom Altobelli takes innovative approach

04 Jun
Taunts, cruelty to pets now domestic violence

02 Jun
Growing importance of men in families

02 Jun
Member calls for Government to undertake a comprehensive review of family law and the ...

29 May
New practice note for AVOs in the local Court (NSW)

27 May
New Federal Magistrate Myers appointed to Newcastle

14 May
Girls 'taken' before being deported to Italy

06 May
Child support payments secured by new investigation unit

04 May
Single parents to lose benefits

01 May
Child protection boosted

01 May
INTERNATIONAL PARENTAL CHILD ABDUCTION

26 Apr
Ex-lover punished for Facebook revenge

29 Mar
The fruits of litigation!

27 Mar
De Facto property laws pass parliament

03 Mar
Grandparents lose out again! Couple lose court battle to contact grandchildren

29 Feb
Family Court restructure Bill to be reintroduced

29 Feb
Government moves to provide certainty over de facto property court orders

22 Feb
Family Courts bungle casts doubt on de facto property settlements

29 Jan
Mum's hate campaign against stepmother reverses lives with parent

02 Jan
CSA new account statements imminent

28 Dec
Grandparents ignore State Government and CSA collect.

15 Dec
Separated parents should not share custody of babies or toddlers under two !


Search

Calendar - Sep 2014

M T W T F S S
2014-09-01
1 ,
2014-09-02
2 ,
2014-09-03
3 ,
2014-09-04
4 ,
2014-09-05
5 ,
2014-09-06
6 ,
2014-09-07
7 ,
2014-09-08
8 ,
2014-09-09
9 ,
2014-09-10
10 ,
2014-09-11
11 ,
2014-09-12
12 ,
2014-09-13
13 ,
2014-09-14
14 ,
2014-09-15
15 ,
2014-09-16
16 ,
2014-09-17
17 ,
2014-09-18
18 ,
2014-09-19
19 ,
2014-09-20
20 ,
2014-09-21
21 ,
2014-09-22
22 ,
2014-09-23
23 ,
2014-09-24
24 ,
2014-09-25
25 ,
2014-09-26
26 ,
2014-09-27
27 ,
2014-09-28
28 ,
2014-09-29
29 ,
2014-09-30
30 ,









News, Articles & Press Releases


Added 18 October, 2011, 08:47 AM
Author: Secretary SPCA  


Mum ordered to pay back sterile 'dad'
By Shelley Hadfield
Herald Sun (Melbourne)
8 October 2011

Quote: The woman told the Federal Magistrates Court she now remembered having had a one-night encounter with another man.

A mum has been ordered to repay child support to a man she claimed was her son's father after he found he could not conceive.
The man spent nine years believing the child was his after what he says was a "one-night stand".

He told a court he believed the mother had manipulated the situation.
The woman has now been ordered to repay the $3,730 he paid in child support.
The couple, who cannot be identified, met on the internet in late 2000 and had a brief rendezvous in 2001.

They lived in different states.
The woman claimed she believed he was the only person who could have been the dad.

She had him sign a statutory declaration stating he was the father so she could receive the family tax benefit.
But the man discovered last year, while trying to conceive a child with his new partner, that he was "physiologically incapable of conceiving a child".
   My wife 'used to love me so much'
   Husband thought he had the perfect life
A test later excluded him as the father.

The woman told the Federal Magistrates Court she now remembered having had a one-night encounter with another man.
She told the court she had suffered depression and stress from an earlier abusive relationship and her memory and thought processes were not clear.

She did not know the real father's identity.

In a judgment published this week, Federal Magistrate Stewart Brown said the mother had been negligent rather than deceitful in not telling the man of her earlier liaison.
"I think it unlikely that (the mother) would have forgotten her earlier liaison with the person she now concedes must be the (boy's) father," Mr Brown said.
He said the woman had at best been lax and at worst disingenuous.
Mr Brown ordered her to repay the man $15 a fortnight, saying he had paid her child support to which she was not legally entitled.
The woman fought the application that she repay child support, arguing such an order would be oppressive because she was in tough financial circumstances.
The man told the court he had been "harried" by the Child Support Agency.
Mr Brown said the couple had made some attempt to be a family, living together for two weeks after the boy's birth.

But the man had had little contact with the boy since he was a toddler.
Mr Brown said the man approached the intimate relationship with a level of irresponsibility.
"Without wishing to appear either trite or prurient, it takes two willing participants engaging in unprotected sexual intercourse to conceive a child," the magistrate said.

View archive

   
   
   
   
   

, Back to the top, www.familylawwebguide.com.au,