Home | WEB Guide | News | Community | Forums | Search
Skip navigation

News Summary

29 Nov
Court takes child off mother and reverses lives with parent status

22 Nov
Supreme Court rules wording on police interim intervention orders 'too vague'

10 Nov
Child-related AVOs in NSW rise 76 per cent after police given new powers

09 Nov
Mother stops father seeing daughter for 12 years - despite 82 court orders

25 Oct
Retired Family Court judge Richard Chisholm has passed his 'use by date'

06 Oct
Child Support - Change of Assessment data

05 Oct
Commonwealth Ombudsman highlights serious failings in Australias child support system

04 Oct
Labor MP Michelle Rowland wants parliament to apply more scrutiny to Child Support pay...

14 Sep
NSW to introduce legislation to support the broadcasting of judgments and sentences

24 Aug
Exeter man denied refund after paying 30,000 in child support for girl that wasn't his...

08 Aug
Confidence betrayed by the justice system

30 Apr
inquiry into how the child support system works, including links between it and the Fa...

24 Apr
Domestic violence study flawed say mens health advocates

27 Jan
Court refuses to send quake-affected boys to NZ

14 Dec
Child's school project becomes a plea to the Family Court

18 Oct
Woman who took child abroad on trial

18 Oct
Barriers make child's play hard work for grandads

12 Oct
International report on fathers paternity leave after birth of bubs

05 Oct
Child trapped in Egypt by bizarre custody battle

03 Sep
Paternal influence crucial to the success of children

25 Aug
March against Alienation - Fathers Day Hyde Park

13 Aug
Hard line over child abuse (NZ)

06 Jul
False abuse claims are the new court weapon, retiring judge says

11 May
NSW Government releases Domestic Violence App

29 Apr
Defendants To Front Up In Court Study (NZ)

11 Apr
Cost of raising a child to 18 is now $1 million

08 Apr
Cost of raising a child

06 Feb
Gotcha tapes disliked by court

02 Feb
Review of Australias national Paid Parental Leave scheme

06 Jan
Age eligibility for Family Tax Benefit Part A has changed

01 Jan
Minister Macklin announces changes to Newstart

14 Dec
Lawyers say Family Court reforms pose risk to vulnerable (NZ)

21 Oct
There's got to be something more than this! say men

12 Oct
Mothers who deny fathers access to the couples children after a break-up could be jail...

03 Oct
Father must withdraw criminal charges - Girls ordered back to Italy

02 Oct
New name for Federal Magistrates Court revealed.

15 Sep
Opposition Grows to British Governments Parenting Proposal (UK)

23 Aug
WA court counsellors sticking fathers with false allegations

07 Aug
Sisters lose High Court custody challenge

03 Aug
Feuding couples to pay for dispute resolution (NZ)

23 Jul
Child support formula baffles 90% of parents - AIFS study

12 Jul
Dad's 'good times' with daughter cut by court

29 Jun
Family Court seeks missing children

23 Jun
Tough means test locks low-income earners out of Legal Aid

20 Jun
Dads needed on Father's Day [USA]

19 Jun
Government Assent and Notice of increased fees

13 Jun
Publications released on new Family Law changes June 2012

07 Jun
FM Tom Altobelli takes innovative approach

04 Jun
Taunts, cruelty to pets now domestic violence

02 Jun
Growing importance of men in families

02 Jun
Member calls for Government to undertake a comprehensive review of family law and the ...

29 May
New practice note for AVOs in the local Court (NSW)

27 May
New Federal Magistrate Myers appointed to Newcastle

14 May
Girls 'taken' before being deported to Italy

06 May
Child support payments secured by new investigation unit

04 May
Single parents to lose benefits

01 May
Child protection boosted

01 May

26 Apr
Ex-lover punished for Facebook revenge

29 Mar
The fruits of litigation!


Calendar - Jan 2015

1 ,
2 ,
3 ,
4 ,
5 ,
6 ,
7 ,
8 ,
9 ,
10 ,
11 ,
12 ,
13 ,
14 ,
15 ,
16 ,
17 ,
18 ,
19 ,
20 ,
21 ,
22 ,
23 ,
24 ,
25 ,
26 ,
27 ,
28 ,
29 ,
30 ,
31 ,

News, Articles & Press Releases

Added 22 February, 2012, 11:14 AM
Author: The Australian  

The Australian
22 February 2012

Court bungle to hit de factos as error throws property settlements into doubt
By Nicola Berkovic

Thousands of Family Court orders relating to de facto couples, including property settlements and maintenance agreements, have been cast into doubt by a major federal government blunder.

The government neglected in 2009 to arrange for the Governor-General to proclaim a start date for legislation that handed power to the Family Court to handle property and maintenance disputes between de facto couples. The mistake, which Attorney-General Nicola Roxon last night labelled an "unfortunate administrative error", means all such property and maintenance orders by the Family Court and Federal Magistrates Court between March 2009 and February 11 this year are now uncertain.

Ms Roxon, the Federal Attorney General said

The the government was working to fix the issue as soon as possible
but the opposition seized on the blunder as an "astonishing act of incompetence" that reinforced the view that the government could not get anything right.

Previously, heterosexual and same-sex de facto couples had their property matters dealt with by the state courts.

In 2009, the states referred their powers to the commonwealth, for the first time enabling de facto couples to have their property disputes dealt with by the Family Court as married couples do. However, no start date for the proclamation was arranged.

It is understood this oversight occurred within the Attorney-General's Department, when Robert McClelland was attorney-general. This meant the changes failed to begin.

The result is that since 2009 the Family Court has been making orders relating to de facto couples for which it had no jurisdiction.

Ms Roxon said she had directed her department to put its full attention to fixing the problem as quickly as possible. "This is a very unfortunate administrative error where a small mistake can have extensive consequences," she said.

The blunder was detected only earlier this month during Family Court proceedings in Melbourne. The case was adjourned until the issues with the legislation could be resolved.

A proclamation by Governor-General Quentin Bryce was rushed through on February 9 and the changes to the laws finally took effect on February 11.

This means that any orders made from February 11 cannot be challenged.

However, any orders made between March 1, 2009, and February 11 this year are potentially invalid because the Family Court did not have jurisdiction to make them.

The chairman of the family law division of the Law Council of Australia, Geoff Sinclair said

The Family Court and Federal Magistrates Court were trying to ascertain how many cases were involved, but he believed they were in the thousands.

We are looking to see whether there can be retrospective legislation to deal with those cases . . . I think that is certainly doable.

We are urging the Attorney-General to take whatever steps are necessary, as soon as possible, to make sure legislation is enacted.
He said about 90 per cent of family orders were made by consent so he hoped they would not be challenged by the parties.

Geoff Sinclair said

It doesn't matter whether parties are in a de facto relationship or a marital relationship; when the relationship breaks down there'll often be a lot of emotion from both sides.

We certainly don't want a position where people have to go back and revisit issues that have occurred in the past, when hopefully people have put things behind them.

Opposition legal affairs spokesman George Brandis said

This is an astonishing act of incompetence at the heart of government. It reinforces every impression the Australian people must already have that this government cannot get anything right.
However, it is understood a similar oversight occurred under the Howard government in 2006 when the Family Law Act was amended to give the Family Court jurisdiction to consider appeals from family law magistrates in Western Australia.

A proclamation was made to fix this oversight. Senator Brandis said the opposition would support legislation to fix the current problem.

Former Family Court chief justice Alastair Nicholson said

The oversight was serious: If those settlements are called into question, it's obviously very significant for the people involved.

It seems the government has no real choice but to pass legislation retrospectively approving them."
NSW Attorney-General Greg Smith said it was disappointing the federal government had failed to deliver the reforms properly.

View archive


Edited Today
, Back to the top, www.familylawwebguide.com.au,