Home | WEB Guide | News | Community | Forums | Search
ForumsForums,
RulesRules,
GroupsGroups,
UnreadUnread,
RecommendRecommend,
DonateDonate,

Skip navigation

You have 30 minutes to complete this form before the security image will expire.

You are not logged in. If you log in, you will receive point credit for your submission.



* Required field

Title
* Security image
If you have a vision impairment, please contact a member of staff to perform this action on your behalf. If you are viewing this text instead of an image, try refreshing the page.
To prevent bots, we require you to duplicate the text shown in the image, in the text box.

This field supports comcode

Your message



 

Attachments

These attachments allow you to upload files to our server to be embedded with this content; after an attachment is added, you will be given the option to add another. For your content to be accessible to those with visual impairments you should make sure you give a caption to each attachment which summarises it appropriately; you should also aim to avoid using media attachments when more accessible alternatives are possible.

Please note that we only support the following file types as image attachments: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, tif. There are numerous programs that can convert other files to these formats. Other file formats will either be shown as downloads, or as an embedded media type.

Attachment 1

Upload
Type
Caption

Attachment 2

Upload
Type
Caption

Attachment 3

Upload
Type
Caption

Posts

(#45643) – By MikeT

It could perhaps be based upon responsibility (e.g. paying towards the child). I do believe that advice is being provided for recipients to try to claim a responsibility (financial, emotional, discipline, communication .......), the CSA use the terminology "Ongoing Daily Care" when a child is in the care of another.

An example could be a child who is being provided for by welfare payments , e.g. rent, health costs, food, specialised assistance, due to health issues and the child is living away from both parents. A parent then tries to establish a financial responsibility say by paying for mobile phone rental and usage to claim CS.

Here's an extract from the CSA Guide that includes this. This extract is under the heading "Older Children living away from home". However, "Ongoing Daily Care" it is not limited to older children:


The CSA Guide - 2.2.1: Basics of care said

Older children living away from home

Generally, older children who live independently and separately from their parents (and any non-parent carers) provide for many of their own care needs. This may include meeting their own ongoing daily needs (such as meal preparation, transport, socialising, etc) as well as making their own decisions about their daily activities, schooling and health issues. Therefore, it may be difficult to establish whether a person provides care for an older child who lives separately from that person.

Where a person provides substantial financial support to an older child living away from home, CSA will generally consider that financial support as an indicator that the person is continuing to provide care for the child. The support can be in relation to daily costs such as food, accommodation and transport, and/or in relation to longer term costs such as school fees, paying for airfares home for holidays, clothing, health and dental care, etc.

Example

M and F have one child, A, who is 16 and working part time after leaving school early. M helps A find a suitable flat and pays the bond so that A can move closer to work. M helps A to pay for rent and utilities, and assists with other expenses such as buying work clothes and arranging and paying for medical appointments. M also helps A with decisions about things like finding alternative study options for further education. Every weekend M does A's laundry and provides cooked meals for the week. CSA would determine that M continues to care for A for child support purposes despite A living separately from M.


While financial support is often a key factor in determining whether a person cares for a child who lives away from home, it will not always be the sole determinant. In cases where the financial support provided is limited, and/or where other factors exist that suggest that the person continues to care for the child, CSA will consider whether the person is actively involved in major decisions relating to the child. For example, decisions relating to the child's health, schooling, relationships, career, etc may be indicators that the person continues to provide care for the child.

Example

M and F have one child, A, who is 17 and working as an apprentice. A decides to rent a room in a share house. F helps A move in and pays the cost of petrol on the occasions A comes back for a visit. F also makes deposits into A's bank account every now and then if A needs some extra cash to make ends meet. A pays for rent, utilities and any other expenses, and shares in household chores including meal preparation and cleaning. Unless there were other relevant factors, CSA would determine that A is living independently and F does not care for A for child support purposes.

View

Termination of assessment?? (#45642) – By DVS69

Hey everyone,

so I read the termination of assessment and found that if the mother can still claim at least 35% care of the child the assessment cannot be terminated!! OK!! Knowing that the mother would say that she has 35% care of our daughter just to keep the child support, what happens to the other 65% care? Why is CSA claiming that the mother has 100% care of our daughter when she doesn't???

Any help would be greatly apprieciated!!

View

, Back to the top, www.familylawwebguide.com.au,